AeroLoop · Engineering note

AeroLoop finds landing error before first contact

Two no-outage cases exceed the final-support position bound at contact. Retained analysis separates approach, contact and disarm while an opt-in decay candidate remains experimental.

No-outage baseline: distance from home, metres
SeedFirst contactAt disarmAfter disarm, increase
4010.5740.632+0.029
5030.3540.384+0.044
Both cases already exceed the 0.350 m final-support position bound at first contact. The last column is the increase in distance from home, not path length. Derived from retained JSON; no new flight.
Separate PR #25 decay experiment, original gates
ModeMissionsPairsRecovery
baseline7/123/68/12
candidate8/125/69/12

accepted: false. The decay candidate remains experimental. PR #26 analyzes 24 retained flights and 76,824 landing rows with 0 new flights. Offline readiness is descriptive; residual impulse is not measured friction.

Download retained landing record

Inspect pinned landing evidence ↗

PR #25 compares a fixed vertical-disturbance decay candidate with the original predictor. Across 18 new final flights and six retained references, missions improve from 7/12 to 8/12, same-mode outage pairs from 3/6 to 5/6 and recovery windows from 8/12 to 9/12. The candidate remains experimental and accepted: false.

PR #26 adds zero flights. Its landing-contact lab analyzes 24 retained flights and 76,824 full-rate landing rows. No-outage seeds 401 and 503 already exceed the 0.350 m final-support position bound at first contact. Post-disarm increases in distance from home are only 0.029 m and 0.044 m; these are not path lengths.

The next bounded experiment targets pre-contact tracking and contact orientation. Offline readiness predicates are descriptive, residual impulse is not measured friction, and AL-010 remains open. Full 3D bundles remain local. The website derives its table from the public record without executing PhysX.

Follow the evidence

Explore AeroLoop

Read source evidence ↗ (opens in a new tab)

Related reading